Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Intern Med ; 60(19): 3087-3092, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1511911

ABSTRACT

Objective Due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations and symptoms, it is difficult to distinguish COVID-19 from mimics. A common pitfall is to rush to make a diagnosis when encountering a patient with COVID-19-like symptoms. The present study describes a series of COVID-19 mimics using an outpatient database collected from a designated COVID-19 healthcare facility in Tokyo, Japan. Methods We established an emergency room (ER) tailored specifically for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 called the "COVID-ER." In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we enrolled patients who visited the COVID-ER from February 1 to September 5, 2020. The outcomes included the prevalence of COVID-19, admission, potentially fatal diseases and final diagnosis. Results We identified 2,555 eligible patients. The median age was 38 (interquartile range, 26-57) years old. During the study period, the prevalence of COVID-19 was 17.9% (457/2,555). Non-COVID-19 diagnoses accounted for 82.1% of all cases. The common cold had the highest prevalence and accounted for 33.0% of all final diagnoses, followed by gastroenteritis (9.4%), urinary tract infections (3.8%), tonsillitis (2.9%), heat stroke (2.6%) and bacterial pneumonia (2.1%). The prevalence of potentially fatal diseases was 14.2% (298/2,098) among non-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion Several potentially fatal diseases remain masked among the wave of COVID-19 mimics. It is imperative that a thorough differential diagnostic panel be considered prior to the rendering of a COVID-19 diagnosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , COVID-19 Testing , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Respir Investig ; 59(5): 614-621, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1260851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-term repercussions of critical COVID-19 on pulmonary function and imaging studies remains unexplored. In this study, we investigated the pulmonary function and computed tomography (CT) findings of critical COVID-19 patients approximately 100 days after symptom onset. METHODS: We retrospectively extracted data on critical COVID-19 patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation during hospitalization from April to December 2020 and evaluated their pulmonary function, residual respiratory symptoms and radiographic abnormalities on CT. RESULTS: We extracted 17 patients whose median age was 63 (interquartile range [IQR], 59-67) years. The median lengths of hospitalization and mechanical ventilation were 23 (IQR, 18-38) and 9 (IQR, 6-13) days, respectively. At 100 days after symptom onset, the following pulmonary function abnormalities were noted in 8 (47%) patients: a diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (%DLCO) of <80% for 6 patients (35%); a percent vital capacity (%VC) of <80% for 4 patients (24%); and a forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1%) of <70% for 1 patient (6%) who also presented with %DLCO and %VC abnormalities. Twelve (71%) patients reported residual respiratory symptoms and 16 (94%) showed abnormalities on CT. CONCLUSIONS: Over 90% of the critical COVID-19 patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation continued presenting with abnormal imaging studies and 47% of the patients presented with abnormal pulmonary function 100 days after symptom onset. The extent of the residual CT findings might be associated with the degree of abnormal pulmonary function in critical COVID-19 survivors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases/etiology , Middle Aged , Respiratory Function Tests , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Survivors
3.
Intern Med ; 60(3): 473-477, 2021 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067517

ABSTRACT

We experienced two cases of post-intubation laryngotracheal stenosis (PILS) occurring in patients after acute coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 in a relatively narrow time period. The patients required mechanical ventilation for 9 days in one and 28 days in the other. In both cases, the patients were discharged but later developed symptoms of cough and dyspnea, which were later diagnosed as PILS. Persistent cough and dyspnea are common symptoms in both PILS and the recovery phase of severe COVID-19. For this reason, PILS should be considered in the differential diagnosis post-COVID-19 patients. In addition, the prevalence of PILS may be greater than that of other critical diseases in severe COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Tracheal Stenosis/etiology , Adult , Cough/etiology , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Humans , Laryngoscopy , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Thoracic , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trachea/diagnostic imaging , Tracheal Stenosis/diagnosis , Tracheal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL